Sunday, January 25, 2009

Darwinism

What, in your own words, is Social Darwinism? How was it used to explain a variety of circumstances (e.g. economic and racial/ethnic) in the late 19th century? Do you hear any of the same sentiments echoed today? Evaluate the theory. Do you find it valid? Why or why not?

Social Darwinism is the theory that embraces Charles Darwin's theory of "Survival of the Fittest," stating that the strongest and fittest members of society should survive while the weaker and less capable members of society should be allowed to die. Essentially, in the early 19th century, what this meant was that the white men who worked and earned money to support themselves and their families would flourish and become powerful while the black families, single women, and non-working men should be looked down upon by society and, ultimately, die off, leaving only the strong and powerful.

This, in the minds of our ancestors during the 19th century, justified the cruel treatment of African Americans and the people in the the "lower class." It made a passage of sorts for the corrupt government to trample over the rights of the not-so-fortunate and give strength to those who could pay for it.

These kinds of sentiments are still here today, but not quite as strong. In modern day American society, however, this directs more to income and wealth rather than race and ethnicity. From personal experience, many people even today view the poor with a certain kind of contempt. Some people believe that the poor were born with a certain kind of flaw that makes them unable to earn money while others believe they are simply lazy. Whatever the reason, the poor are often viewed as unfit for many things American society offers.

The fact of the matter, however, is that most of the poor in America are discontent with being poor and take many steps to try and move themselves out of their lifestyle. My roommate was actually born into less than desirable financial and familial circumstances and has lived most of his life surviving on barely any money. Despite this, he possesses one of the most active and bright minds I know.

Social Darwinism is a faulty theory. People shouldn't be divided by classes, gender, and race, but rather by ability. It simply seems ridiculous that a rich, stupid white man would be more qualified to live than a poor, smart black woman. But society is an odd thing. Humans are odd people with odd ideals. What a world we live in.

1 comment:

  1. Divisions along lines of ability can lead to ableism.

    Good insight on how we dismiss the poor.

    ReplyDelete